Scott Clayton vs Peter Kobelt Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L L L W L L
Form
L L W W L W W W L LH2H: Clayton 1 - 0 Kobelt
They have played 2 sets in total, with Clayton winning 2 and Kobelt winning 0. The last match between Clayton and Kobelt was at the Great Britain F6, 06-07-2015, First, Grass with Scott Clayton getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Scott Clayton | 1 |
| Peter Kobelt | 0 |
Great Britain F6(06-07-2015)
6
4
6
2
| Clayton | Stats | Kobelt |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 689 | Highest Rank | 332 |
| 31 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 4 |
| 53% (136-120) | Career Total W/L | 62% (216-131) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alexandrova VS Kasatkina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Scott Clayton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Federico Zeballos
Player
Scott Clayton
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Brechemier
Player
Scott Clayton
37%
(
22 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
73%
(
27 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Osmakcic
Player
Scott Clayton
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
8
Aces
6
14
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioannis Stergiou
Player
Scott Clayton
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
97
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Scott Duncan
Player
Scott Clayton
75%
(
107 of
143)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
114)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
64 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
130
Total Points Won
127
|
6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas S. Hu
Player
Scott Clayton
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Scott Clayton
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Scott Clayton
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Peter Kobelt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Ribeiro Marcondes
Player
Peter Kobelt
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
6-7(4) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Peter Kobelt
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Uisung Park
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
67 of
117)
13
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(10) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Sean Hodkin
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Alexandar Lazarov
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(2) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexandar Lazarov
Player
Peter Kobelt
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
101)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Kobelt
Player
Uisung Park
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
9
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Schott
Player
Peter Kobelt
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
23
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Brugnerotto
Player
Peter Kobelt
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
58 of
100)
10
Aces
13
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
45 of
58)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
105
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (136/120) | Win/Loss | 62% (216/131) |
| 53% (307/272) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (472/301) |
| 52% (2765/2569) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4056/3480) |
| 57% (89/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (158/86) |
| 52% (14/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (12/11) |
| 52% (31/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (46/32) |
| 15% (2/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
| 329 | Aces Total | 2141 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 350 | Total Double Faults | 764 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 480.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 575.94 |
| 58% (2906/5036) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9208/15007) |
| 69% (2016/2906) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (6932/9208) |
| 46% (989/2130) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (2975/5799) |
| 43% (226/529) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (493/1309) |
| 40% (2102/5202) | Return Points Win % | 36% (5465/15033) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 11% (1/8) | Challenger W/L | 45% (19/23) |
| 55% (135/111) | Futures W/L | 65% (197/108) |
| 53% (135/254) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (212/339) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 53% (36/68) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (82/146) |
| 48% (33/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (41/83) |
| 89% (131/116) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (217/191) |
| 11% (131/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (217/25) |
| 15% (125/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (130/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
